How Secure Are Default Settings in Security Service Edge Solutions?

October 3, 2024
How Secure Are Default Settings in Security Service Edge Solutions?

In the dynamic landscape of cybersecurity, the Security Service Edge (SSE) appears as a crucial endeavor, particularly as businesses increasingly embrace cloud-based solutions and remote workforces. SSE, a subset of Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), underpins cyber defenses with a blend of Secure Web Gateways (SWG), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB), and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). These components are vital in providing protection across distributed networks, enhancing the flexibility and scalability necessary for modern enterprises. Despite its significance, a pressing question remains: How secure are users relying on vendors’ default configurations?

This question was the focal point of a “Mini-Test” conducted by CyberRatings.org, an initiative dedicated to enhancing confidence in cybersecurity products through rigorous research and testing. The results of this study revealed significant variability in the security provided by default configurations of SSE solutions. For organizations heavily relying on cloud-based infrastructures and remote workforces, understanding the effectiveness of these default settings is paramount, as it influences the integrity of their cybersecurity defenses.

Understanding Security Service Edge (SSE)

Security Service Edge encompasses critical security functionalities designed to protect users, devices, and applications regardless of their geographical location. In a world where hybrid work environments are becoming the norm, SSE offers a robust solution by ensuring consistent security policy enforcement ubiquitously. This capability mitigates risks, oversees access to cloud services, and safeguards data with efficacy that transcends traditional network boundaries. Importantly, SSE solutions strive to deliver seamless protection without compromising on performance or user experience.

However, the effectiveness of these solutions hinges significantly on the configurations set by the vendors. Many consumers operate under the assumption that out-of-the-box settings will provide sufficient protection against cyber threats. This expectation aligns with the “Secure-by-Default” philosophy advocated by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which emphasizes products being resilient against common exploits from the outset. Without examining and potentially modifying these configurations, users might be exposing themselves to undue risk.

The “Secure-by-Default” approach emphasizes the importance of resilience against common cyber threats directly out of the box. However, as the study by CyberRatings.org illustrates, not all SSE vendors meet this expectation. Some deliver robust protections straight out of the box, while others necessitate additional configurations to achieve an acceptable level of security. This divergence in baseline security levels poses a significant challenge for enterprises seeking to protect their digital environments comprehensively.

Disparity in Default Security Configurations

The “Mini-Test” conducted by CyberRatings.org sheds light on a substantial variability in default security settings among SSE vendors. Analyzing seven products revealed a glaring disparity: while some default configurations exhibited commendable malware blocking capabilities, others showed absolute vulnerability, offering no protection at all. Specifically, three out of the seven products tested failed to block any malware in their default state.

This disparity is concerning, as it lays bare the inconsistency in the industry regarding baseline security expectations. Users banking on default settings could find themselves exposed to significant cybersecurity threats, thereby underscoring the necessity for close examination and potential reconfiguration of these settings. Such a gap between vendor performance in default settings reveals the imperative for enterprises to not rely blindly on out-of-the-box configurations but instead delve deeper into their chosen SSE products’ security capabilities.

The variability in default configurations points to a broader issue within the cybersecurity industry: the lack of standardized expectations for out-of-the-box security. While some vendors prioritize high-security defaults, others appear to leave significant gaps that could be exploited by cybercriminals. This inconsistency necessitates a more informed approach from users, demanding they not only assess their chosen solutions but also actively engage in the initial configuration to ensure robust protection from the start.

Significant Improvements Through Configuration Adjustments

While some products showed disheartening default performances, a silver lining emerged via configuration adjustments. CyberRatings.org found that minor tweaks could dramatically enhance security efficacy. In instances where default protections were nonexistent, adjustments spiked the malware blocking effectiveness from 0% to over 90% on average. These findings draw attention to the critical role configuration plays in the security apparatus, suggesting that vendors might not always deliver optimal settings out-of-the-box. User vigilance in adjusting configurations is thus emphasized, highlighting the potential for substantial security improvements with relatively modest efforts.

These substantial enhancements underscore a critical takeaway: the default settings provided by SSE vendors should not be taken at face value. Instead, users must approach these configurations with a discerning eye, ready to make necessary adjustments to align with their specific security needs. This proactive stance can lead to markedly improved protection, turning initially vulnerable configurations into robust defenses against cyber threats.

The findings from CyberRatings.org’s study reveal that with informed adjustments, even initially underwhelming solutions can be transformed into highly effective protection mechanisms. This potential for improvement through configuration changes highlights a crucial aspect of SSE solutions – that they are not static products but dynamic systems that can be optimized through user engagement and detailed configuration processes. Therefore, it becomes clear that achieving optimal security efficacy necessitates a hands-on approach.

Meeting Customer Expectations with Secure Defaults

Despite the potential for boosting security through configurations, a mismatch persists between user expectations and actual product performance. Most customers expect high-level security from the start, paralleling the “Secure-by-Default” guidelines. This expectation is not unfounded, particularly given the complex and evolving nature of cyber threats that require robust defenses right out of the box. However, the reality as depicted by the CyberRatings.org study suggests otherwise, pointing to significant gaps that need to be addressed through user intervention.

The gap between expectation and reality amplifies when guided setups target non-technical implementers. The reliance on guided setups that do not encompass comprehensive security adjustments exposes organizations to risks. Users must challenge the assumption of default security and proactively seek to tailor settings to their security needs. This proactive approach is critical, particularly for non-technical users who might otherwise assume that guided setups provided by vendors ensure complete security.

While it is understandable why users would expect out-of-the-box security to be sufficient, the findings of the CyberRatings.org study make it clear that a more hands-on approach is often necessary. SSE vendors must strive to meet the “Secure-by-Default” expectations to enhance user confidence, but until such a standard is universally adopted and adhered to, users must take it upon themselves to ensure their configurations are robust. This conscious and proactive stance will enable organizations to bridge the expectation gap and fortify their cybersecurity posture effectively.

Vendor Performance Analysis

The study offers detailed insights into individual vendor performances under both default and configured states. For instance, Zscaler shone with a 96.74% malware blocking rate in its default setting, while Cisco attained 100% efficacy after enabling sandboxing. Conversely, vendors like Checkpoint and Versa required significant configuration for notable improvements, transitioning from 0% to 89.96% and 83.86% malware blocking respectively, post adjustments. These disparate results highlight the necessity for users to delve into both default and recommended configurations to safeguard their digital environments adequately.

Exploring the specific performances of vendors under default settings reveals a wide spectrum of efficacy. This highlights the importance of scrutinizing each solution on its merits and making necessary adjustments to ensure optimal security. While vendors like Zscaler and Cisco demonstrate that high security can be achieved with minimal adjustments, others such as Checkpoint and Versa require more significant configuration changes. This variability necessitates a more informed and proactive stance from users.

The comprehensive analysis of vendor performances provided by CyberRatings.org serves as a critical resource for enterprises. By understanding the capabilities and limitations of each product in both their default and configured states, organizations can make more informed decisions about their cybersecurity strategies. This knowledge allows for a tailored approach, ensuring that specific security needs are met and that vulnerabilities are minimized.

Active Approach to SSE Configuration

In the ever-evolving realm of cybersecurity, the Security Service Edge (SSE) stands out as a critical component, especially as businesses adopt cloud solutions and remote work models. SSE, part of the broader Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) framework, enhances cybersecurity with tools like Secure Web Gateways (SWG), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB), and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). These tools are essential for securing distributed networks, offering the flexibility and scalability that modern businesses need.

Despite its importance, a vital question persists: How safe are users who depend on vendors’ default configurations? This issue was at the heart of a “Mini-Test” by CyberRatings.org, a group focused on boosting trust in cybersecurity products through detailed research and testing. Their study found notable differences in the security provided by default settings of SSE solutions. For businesses that rely heavily on cloud infrastructure and remote workforces, understanding the effectiveness of these default configurations is crucial, as it directly impacts the strength and reliability of their cybersecurity measures.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later